AI use in content marketing is here to stay. So, what’s the plan?

The honeymoon phase of AI is over, and what was initially a shiny new tool is now a strategic conundrum. CMOs are grappling with questions from the board, CEOs, and non-execs alike, including:

  • What is our AI strategy?
  • How is it being used in our marketing?
  • What risks does it introduce?
  • Where does responsibility sit?

The uncomfortable truth is that, in many organisations, AI has already been well and truly wedged into content workflows before these questions were asked. Teams are experimenting independently, and new AI tools are being adopted without proper processes in place in an effort to save time and meet demand.

That kind of unregulated use is more than enough to spike the blood pressure of compliance teams. However, the real risk isn’t AI itself, but rather its unmanaged adoption.

Here’s why AI in content marketing should be treated first and foremost as a governance issue, rather than a technology one.

The problem isn’t AI – it’s the absence of guardrails

When AI use is left unchecked, it amplifies problems rather than solving them.

AI can churn out content at breakneck speed. But if it isn’t used with care, it can also dilute your brand voice and normalise mediocrity at the same pace. It can introduce factual inaccuracies and generic, cookie-cutter insights into content that’s supposed to build trust and authority. Most concerningly of all, it can do this quietly and at scale, with issues compounding over time before anyone realises there’s a problem.

But banning AI outright is neither realistic nor strategic. According to an Orbit Media study, AI adoption among content marketers has grown from 65% to 95% since 2023. Almost all marketers are using AI in some capacity, whether the C-suite likes it or not.

AI use in content marketing is now so widespread that organisations that attempt to ban it entirely will simply drive it underground. Teams will continue to use it anyway, but without the oversight and accountability that comes with managed and regulated AI use.

For business leaders wondering whether AI can really improve their workflows, the question isn’t whether to accept its adoption – that decision has already been made in practice. Instead, they should be looking to guide its use in a way that increases efficiency while preserving content quality and brand value.

Why boards are asking the wrong question

Many boards approach AI through a solely commercial lens. They ask how much time it can save, how many roles it might replace, or how it can reduce operational cost. In fact, research by the World Economic Forum found 40% of employers expect to cut their workforces in favour of AI automation. But in content marketing, this framing is dangerous and opens brands up to potential long-term problems.

When AI is positioned purely as a cost-cutting shortcut, the people most often affected are entry-level and mid-career professionals. These are the roles where skills are learned and judgement is developed. If AI replaces those positions, there’s no longer a clear path for developing the next generation of leaders. You can’t promote an AI agent into a manager role (for now at least).

There’s also the issue of content quality. When AI is running the show, content is produced faster and cheaper, but its quality erodes over time as short-term efficiency gains are prioritised over long-term trust.

However tempting it might be to boards scrutinising their balance sheets, AI shouldn’t be treated as a replacement for content teams – it should be used as a tool that helps those teams do better work.

AI risk is higher in content

Not all marketing activity carries the same level of risk from AI adoption – content is uniquely exposed.

Content shapes brand perception, informs buying decisions, and signals expertise. Once published, it lives on indefinitely in its own tiny corner of the internet. This is why content that defines thought leadership and strategic positioning should never be fully outsourced to AI.

In a recent essay for The New York Times, Meghan O’Rourke, executive editor of The Yale Review, describes how prolonged use of generative AI began to interfere with her own thinking and creative judgement. Over time, it blurred the line between assistance and authorship, leaving her feeling detached from the work she produced. Anyone who regularly uses LLMs for editorial support will likely be familiar with that feeling.

This matters because audiences still want to feel they are engaging with a subject matter expert. Trust is built through opinion, nuance, and authenticity, and those qualities are uniquely human. AI-supported content can contribute to authority in some cases, but ultimately, people want to know that a real person stands behind an idea.

There’s also a practical search consideration. Expert-written content supports E-E-A-T signals, particularly Experience and Expertise, which search engines increasingly rely on to assess credibility. Content that reflects lived experience and original insight is far harder for AI to replicate convincingly.

Where AI adds real value when governed properly

None of this means AI should be excluded from content. In fact, it’s quite the opposite.

When used responsibly, AI is extremely powerful, but its real strength doesn’t lie in creativity. AI performs best when supporting preparation and production, not editorialising or decision-making. It excels at tasks that are time-consuming but low-risk.

The key is to provide clarity about where AI belongs in the content process. It’s most valuable when supporting with tasks like:

  • research and background synthesis
  • consolidating large data sets
  • summarising reports and extracting insights
  • transcribing interviews and meetings
  • turning data into charts and visual assets
  • structuring outlines and frameworks
  • generating supporting copy such as newsletter summaries or alt text
  • developing headline variations
  • suggesting visual or multimedia formats.

In each of these cases, AI speeds up the planning process and helps teams get past that tricky stage of blank-page paralysis in record time. It isn’t being asked to provide anything truly creative or original, it’s simply freeing up more hours for humans to take care of that themselves.

Three key AI content decisions every organisation must make

Effective AI governance in content should start with three simple questions.

1. What must always remain human-led?

Most organisations have concluded that anything that defines brand voice, strategy, or market positioning must stay human-led.

This includes:

  • core brand narrative and positioning content
  • thought leadership and opinion pieces
  • executive communications
  • strategic messaging frameworks
  • original research and insight-led content
  • editorial judgement and final sign-off.

Human leadership in these areas is non-negotiable.

2. What can be AI-assisted under supervision?

Many parts of the content process can be safely AI-assisted, provided there is clear oversight.

Support, summarisation, reformatting, and repurposing all fall into this category, but outputs should always be reviewed and refined by a human. Early AI-assisted drafts are fine, but they should be fully rewritten to match the author’s voice, your brand’s positioning, and the strategic intent behind the piece.

Standardised guidelines and processes make all the difference here. AI is used solely to increase efficiency, while humans remain responsible for quality control and final approval.

3. What requires central governance?

Without clear policies from the top down, AI use within an organisation fragments quickly. Teams and individuals use their personally preferred AI tools and develop their own ways of working, making governance and cohesion impossible.

To implement AI safely and effectively, businesses need to provide rulesets around approved AI tools, usage logging, risk management, and quality control processes. This sets expectations that scale, rather than micromanaging every prompt.

Central governance ensures consistency, protects the brand, and gives teams confidence and clarity over what approved AI usage looks like.

Governance might slow you down, and that’s ok

A common worry about governing AI usage is the risk of slowing teams down. But in some ways, that’s exactly the intention.

Some AI tools won’t be approved, certain shortcuts might take a while to be implemented, and AI-enhanced workflows may require additional oversight. That friction isn’t necessarily a bad thing.

AI is still in its infancy, and legislation, such as the EU’s landmark AI Act, is only just starting to catch up. For now, organisations must self-regulate. That means being very clear about what information can and can’t be used in AI tools, how they should be used, and where the risks lie for brand authority and customer trust.

From a safety perspective, governing in this way protects sensitive company data and intellectual property. From a quality perspective, it forces teams to consider which tasks are best suited to AI-assistance, and which should remain human-led. These crucial safeguards far outweigh any potential efficiency drawbacks.

How CMOs should navigate AI in content marketing

In recent years, many marketing teams have still been in experimentation mode with AI. But that phase is now ending, and as AI becomes increasingly embedded in content workflows, the risks associated with its unmanaged use compound.

For CMOs, AI shouldn’t be something to fear. Use it deliberately and often. Build a clear understanding of the areas where it genuinely helps your team. But never use it to replace human judgement in the content that defines your brand’s voice, credibility, and trust.

As the AI juggernaut rolls on, organisations must move from reactive experimentation to structured governance. The question is no longer whether to use AI in content marketing, but rather how effectively and responsibly you are governing its use.

Can AI truly make content teams more effective? Absolutely – but only when everyone is clear on the rules of engagement.

Let SALT.agency help with your content marketing strategy

Looking to future-proof your content strategy in the age of AI? Our content marketing services help brands earn attention, build authority, and get target audiences talking to you. If you need support with your content strategy, get in touch with our expert team today.